Icebreakers
Find out what's on your partner's mind, share what's on yours, and get insights from other couples. We ask what you might not think to.
Have a suggestion for an Icebreaker?
Submit it here.
+ 10
Is it better to have loved and lost or never to have loved at all? Why?
Ask your friends
Copy link
Answered by 
Obviously loved and lost because you still have happy memories to sustain you. (Thinking Kate Winslet's character in Titanic). If you've never loved at all then you've never know joy and that would leave you empty and alone and bitter. (Thinking every nun at Sacred Hearts Academy).
Better to have loved because I'm better because I met u
I would count knowing Jas as one of the greatest pleasures of my life, even should it end in a painful manner. Her beauty, both inside and out, deserve the greatest specimen humankind has to offer, and I truly hope she finds it (as long as it's with me :P).
Better to have loved because I'm better because I met u
What the fuck?
Love and lost because you learn from those kind of situations and you make good memories with that certain person, even sometimes very good friendships ! :)
Deff loved and lost!!!
Loved and lost
Depends on who it is you've loved
Better to have loved!!
I must agree. Better to have loved.
Female, 41-50 years, Married | Apr 02, 2014
Female, 41-50 years, Married | Apr 02, 2014
Sign in to add a comment.
Definitely the former, for two reasons: you know you didn't miss out on something that could've been great, and you'll appreciate real love when you experience it.
Better to have loved
You have to experience both in order to appreciate TRUE LOVE. I've recently loved and lost and it has prepared me for this new relationship.
Loved and lost.
Better to have loved because I'm better because I met u
